logo

What are the Effects of Electronic Cigarettes on Lung Function Compared to Non-Electronic Cigarettes? a Systematic analysis.

Author: Song

Year Published: 2022

Summary

Introduction:
This text provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) inhalation on lung function compared to non-e-cigarette use. The study also examines self-changes in lung function after inhaling e-cigarettes. The text is based on a systematic review of relevant literature from four databases and follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMa) guidelines.

Key Points:

* The study found that short-term e-cigarette inhalation has a similar (but not significant) effect on lung function compared to non-e-cigarettes.
* CO and FeNO were significantly decreased after e-cigarette usage.
* Only asthmatic smokers showed a statistically significant increase in flow resistance after inhaling e-cigarettes.
* The degree of O2 saturation decrease was less than that for the cigarette groups, especially when compared to the conventional cigarette group.
* The decrease of FEV1/FVC% in the non-e-cigarette groups exceeded that in the e-cigarette group.
* Lung-function assessment showed no significant change in pulmonary ventilation measures within 1 month of inhalation of e-cigarettes compared to pre-inhalation.
* The study included 18 articles, most of which had comparatively few participants.

Main Message:
The study suggests that short-term e-cigarette inhalation has a similar (but not significant) effect on lung function compared to non-e-cigarettes. however, more clinical studies are needed to explore the safety of inhaling e-cigarettes, especially in vulnerable populations. The long-term effects of e-cigarette inhalation on lung function are still not well understood and require further investigation.

Citation

Song Y, Li X, Li C, Xu S, Liu Y, Wu X. What are the Effects of Electronic Cigarettes on Lung Function Compared to Non-Electronic Cigarettes? a Systematic analysis. International journal of public health. 2022;67:1604989. doi:10.3389/ijph.2022.1604989
Read Article